Disagreement: The Art of Losing with Dignity

By: A.B. Timothy

If you are a follower of my X account, you may have seen a drama play out on the TL recently. I had a fellow Author, Ryan Williamson (who you might remember from my back and forth with him about A.I. a few weeks ago), block me. It is always disheartening when someone blocks you who you thought of as a peer.

If you wish to read through it, you can see my thread about the drama here. Ultimately, I believe I won because I supported my side of the argument the best. I gave him evidence and asked him questions, neither of which he could answer, instead resorting to the playground-esque behavior of name-calling and cursing.

In the end, he decided to block me instead of continuing the conversation for reasons I can’t pretend to know. Though I would imagine it had to do with either boredom or wounded pride. This is an issue. While yes, the internet is great because you can pick and choose who you interact with, it shows a lack of character on the part of the blocker to block someone because you got annoyed at their response to you. It is basically plugging your ears and saying “La la la.” Because you are done talking with someone.

Now, I have lost my fair share of internet arguments in my time. I even raised the white flag in the back-and-forth Ryan and I had the other week. But what you don’t do, after losing an argument, if you wish to be seen as mature, is block the interlocutor and ignore them.

I understand that religion is a touchy topic for everyone, and it can make emotions run hot very fast, but part of maturity is your command over your own emotions.

So what do you think? Let me know in a comment below or in a reply on X. Give this page a follow if you are looking for inspiration and fun short stories. Also, check out the Newsletter Page to subscribe to receive this week’s Newsletter, which comes out today!

The Need for the Appeal to Authority

By: A.B. Timothy

When arguing with anyone about anything, you need to be able to back up what you are saying. This support usually comes in the form of verbal or written citations, citing sources that are of a higher authority than the debator. In an academic setting, these sources can be peer-sources coming from colleagues or peers in the field, so that you can defend/attack the positions espoused in those papers. When debating online, in person, or at least verbally, the usual best practice is to cite sources that the other person would consider authoritative; that’s where authority comes in.

When I am debating a communist on the merits of their system, I might quote the communist manifesto, where Karl Marx describes the need for slaves in a true communist utopia. Communists usually are anti-slavery, and this revelation, from a source they consider authoritative, will throw them for a loop. This is, unless the communist I am debating is someone who has studied this line of argument and actually had a compelling counter to my attack. Similarly, as a Christian, often Atheists will cite my Scripture, the Bible, as a way to throw me off. I say God is good, they’ll ask, “What about the flood, or the razing of Caanonland?” I say God is just, they might throw the Problem of Evil in my face. I, however, have learned the arguments and can mount a defense against most assaults.

This is where things turn, however. In our modern, liberal society, subjectivity is king. People have decided that whatever they want is best for themselves and everyone around them. God says not to lie with men as you do with women? Liberal society says, ‘Do what feels good.’ God says, “Honor thy father and thy mother.” Liberal society says, ‘Do your parents make you uncomfortable sometimes? Tell us so we can affirm everything fleeting fancy you have.’

Society, for these people, is the highest authority. They don’t need God to preside over society, because they think modern society is a purely humanistic creation that God played no role in. However, humans are always slaves to something, if not God, then our vices and subjective takes. They think Christians are weird when we claim God as our authority, who forbids us from murdering, but the issue is, if they lived in a subjective society that said murder was okay, then, in their worldview, they would have no recourse.

That is enough religious/philosophical ramblings for today. Tomorrow I will be discussing how this applies to writing and literature, promise!

Did you enjoy my ramblings?

Sign up for my Newsletter to get a weekly recap of the articles that week and a preview of this week’s short story!

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨